Pages

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

When the cat's away, the rats get away...with everything

It's been 4 days since the attempted terrorist attack by Nigerian national Omar Abdulmutallab on Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam to Detroit...an attack we are all scratching our heads in wonder at how it even almost happened, considering the terrorist's own father alerted US authorities about his son's Islamic extremism. It's been 4 days, and the response from our administration? An awkward, credibility-killing about-face ("the system worked"...."the system failed") by mistakecretary of Homeland Security Janet Manpolitano. 4 days, and Obama's still on vacay. His excuse? "I'm tired."
I'm tired too. Some of us (white, upper middle class males) have to actually work twice as hard to get half as far in these politically correct times. In between working, my rotations, and a grueling coursework schedule, I'm atoning for all of the crimes my white privilege background has inflicted on people, Quantum-Leap style. Dr. Sam Beckett never did return home.
I love how the DNC spokesman, McCrazyName, releases some bogus statement moaning about how out of touch Republicans are for criticizing Dear Leader's lack of, for better words, balls, and how hypocritical it was that Bush didn't receive any heat for his delay in response to the Dec 22nd, 2001 shoe-bomber attack. Well, for starters, Bush hadn't slept since September 11th. I know some people think this is because he was orchestrating the attack on the WTC himself, which is just about as retarded as liberals' 21st chromosome trisomy. However, Bush was a real leader, who had the trust and support of the American people at the time, and wasn't seen as a milquetoast apologist.
Obama's policy of bending over may suit him well in the bedroom and his marriage, but it isn't working on the national stage. America is great. Period. I'm sorry for you cultural relativists, who argue that the ass-backward Mullahs of Iran and the dhimmis of Saudi Arabia are just as great as our freedom-loving, dreams-are-possible, lack-of-human-rights-violations society. You know, Americans are always trying to bomb hundreds of innocent Muslims on their holy days. That brings me to my next rant : racial profiling. I'm not for it, per se. I'm not saying all Muslims are terrorists. However - all terrorists are Muslims. Stop appeasing these madmen. It's time to show the world again what we proved to them in 1911 and again in 1939-1945. Greatness is the product of American society, and nothing less.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Pelosi wants it both ways

One wonders what is wrong with Nancy Pelosi.

In the latest mind-boggling decision, Pelosi proposes slapping a tax on Wall Street. This part makes sense, at least to liberals. After all, they believe that Wall Street and their deregulated appetite for greed caused the financial collapse - not the social engineering programs instilled by Democrats. The part that doesn't make sense is she now wants the tax (punishment) to be enforced overseas. The reason? TO STOP WALL STREET TALENT FROM GOING OVERSEAS. Check the full article out here:

http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE5AI3ZV20091119?feedType=RSS&feedName=businessNews&rpc=23&sp=true

Wall Street does not work for the American Government, Nancy Pelosi. The American Government, or what's left of it, doesn't get to turn an entire sector of the economy into a scapegoat using flawed logic, levy a tax against them as punishment (as if they don't already get taxed enough), then tell them they can't take their talent elsewhere, that they are forced INDENTURED SERVANTS of the American economy now, forced to perform their jobs at reduced wages and told they can't leave.

I'll keep Wall Street - I'd prefer Congress to leave. At least one of them does something for me.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

Tears From My Father

So, a lot of people have been ranting and raving about how "presidential" Obama is. Completely circumventing the fact he has no experience, they were even willing to lambaste an innocent woman - somebody who wasn't even running against him - as stupid, as a "beauty queen" or "Caribou Barbie" because the fact she had more experience than he did earned their ire and irked them so much that they flew into a tizzy. Well, how is it presidential to use the White House as a bully pulpit to attack news networks?

It is clear that the media carried Obama's water for him. They are certainly to be thanked for putting a green, unexperienced special-interests-pawn community organizer with no real executive experience in the White House. However, one of these media networks - Fox news - didn't go along with the trend and reported things as they actually were. Now Obama and his fat slob of a spokesperson Robert I-need-a-bib Gibbs as well as various other cronies, not to mention The Angry Ballerina Emanuel, have it out for Fox, accusing it of opinion journalism masquerading as legitimate.

How "presidential" do you think this behavior seems to his family? How do you think his wife, his children, and his parents handle this? Granted, his wife is a monster and I don't know anything about his kids or his parents, but the example you set in life is the most important way to raise a child. His kids get daily doses of their father's arrogance, bullying and petulance. They see their father criticize and lash out at those who don't agree with him. What kind of message is that? Your job as a father is far more important than the position you get paid for, and if Rasmussen had a poll for that, his numbers would be even lower than his approval ratings.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

If a commie can't take the heat...then get out of the White House

Self-proclaimed communist Van Jones, Obama's "green czar" (ps why are we using terms that go back to a country which embraced socialism for nearly a century?) has finally come to his senses after pundits have mounted a weeks-long campaign exposing his links to 9/11 Truthers as well as his vicious, juvenile attacks against Republicans. As some of you may remember, Van Jones signed a petition accusing the Bush administration of orchestrating the 2001 terror attacks which has recently come to light, days after referring to Republicans as "assholes."

I must admit it is refreshing that somebody on the Obama administration decided to step down rather than embrace a decades-dead race card. In typical liberal victim fashion, Jones proclaimed making his decision amidst a "smear campaign" leveled against him. I love how when the truth hurts, it becomes a smear campaign with insinuations of slander. Sorry Jones - in an era where information is available at the click of a mouse, don't get upset when people call you out on your own unpatriotic past. It sucks having to pay the piper, doesn't it? To conclude, I'm kind of enjoying the fact this administration is finally having to face the music, and with so many members being called out recently, this is one cacophony that is music to my ears.

Monday, June 29, 2009

the great welfare scam

so, my attention has just been brought to a rather interesting fact. A friend of mine works in a hair salon near Roosevelt and state st in Chicago. Her employees, all black, openly boast about how while many of them don't require link cards, the equivalent of food stamps, all of them apply for them anyways. Some of these women are eligible for $500 a month. They then offer to buy groceries for their friends or other women for half price, I.e. They'll buy $100 of groceries on their link card u
in exchange for $50 in cash. Incidentally these are the people who clamor the loudest for Obama and other
democrats.

Maybe instead of raising taxes ad infinitum and ad nauseum, the city should crack down on the billions of dollars being STOLEN and lost to FRAUD. Try to imagine the billions saved not to mention maybe encouraging ghetto welfare queens to drop their sense of entitlement and maybe look for jobs or other ways to invest into the community instead of just taking.

Friday, May 8, 2009

My personal views on wealth redistribution and universal healthcare

It seems to me that the debate on healthcare is ultimately predicated on the question of whether healthcare is a privilege or a right. I am not a heartless bastard; I would not begrudge medical care to anybody who needs it because of an inability to pay. I'm not sure if this is just because I live in Chicago, home of the "we cater to the lowest common denominator, seek only to please underemployed minorities and encourage as many people as possible to adopt an entitlement mentality in an attempt to boost Mayor Daley's approval ratings" or if it's how liberals all over America think of healthcare, but in any case, a lot of at least anecdotal ramblings I hear from people regarding their complaints of healthcare is that it is somehow the doctors' and specialists' collective fault for demanding compensation. Somehow, it is the burden of the physician to bear all fault for the entire uninsured or underinsured population's woes in healthcare.

As it should be well known by now, a single-payor, or in other words, entirely government-run insurance program, has as many inherent faults and problems with it as does the current privitized-only healthcare system we use in America. In countries with such a plan, such as Canada, this system has led to the rationing of resources, insane wait times for what we consider routine or preventative measures in America, 9 month to one year waiting lists for things like transplants or complicated procedures, and in some cases, a complete inability to meet patient demands in certain fields, such as neurosurgery and oncology. For this reason, Canada routinely sends hundreds of patients over the American border every year, from things such as baby delivery to cerebrospinal and brain injury treatments. In addition, certain procedures or treatments for unusual or rare conditions are just refused flat out, leaving the patient with no choice but to live with the discomfort until they ultimately die. The government denies this is ever due to the expense; however, it is widely known and accepted that certain services are cut due to their cost. This rationing of resources obviously results in death many times - the case of Natasha Richardson certainly makes one wonder, as hospital administrators struggled to determine whether a CT Scan or MRI was a necessary cost to evaluate the late actress' brain. Had she been in America, where MRIs are standard, Ms. Richardson's doctors would have noticed hemorrhaging immediately and she might have survived.

In any case, the disgruntled malaise which was limited formerly to the lower class, but with the recession and increasing cost of healthcare, has found its way into the middle class zeitgeist as well, has sought a scapegoat for its anger and collective frustration. In the spirit of the current "blame/hate/soak-the-rich" mentality fostered by the Obama administration, people have turned to blaming the fact that "doctors make so much money." I have the feeling that most Liberals hold physician compensation as the reason why their healthcare costs are so high - and the government, with its new policy of determining executive compensation and blaming anyone earning a decent income as the problem and not the solution - only serves to fuel the fire. I am speaking in defense of medical professionals. Of all professions, very few require as extensive, thorough, difficult and demanding education and training as those in medicine. Doctors save lives - on top of that, they take oaths to do no harm and to basically exist for the sole purpose of bettering mankind and alleviating pain. The cost of obtaining a medical education is, all things considered, routinely over a quarter of a million dollars. Additionally, it requires sacrificing a decade of life to maintain grueling work and study schedules. Contrary to (liberal/communist) popular opinion, all jobs are not inherently equal. Obama's ideal, idiotic fantasy world where everybody doing work should receive equitable payment is absurd. Not all professions, or people for that matter, are equal. The doctor SHOULD and MUST make more than the hairdresser. The surgeon SHOULD and MUST make more than the plumber. The difference in skill required to do the job is so vastly different it would be criminal to even suggest that "the output of a hairdresser should yield similar pay to the output of a doctor." The fact that uninformed, ignorant miscreants with no outlets to vent their frustration have the audacity to lay the blame with some of society's greatest producers is simply ludicrous and shows a serious lack of maturity. "Can you believe that doc made $3000 just to fix my broken nose? Maybe if he wasn't allowed to participate in this highway robbery our insurance premiums wouldn't be through the roof." First of all - the reason that doctor had to charge $3000 instead of $2000 is thanks to low lives like these complainers, who over the last two decades have sought making a quick buck by engaging in frivolous lawsuits, sending these doctors' malpractice insurance rates skyrocketing. The reason he had to charge $2000 instead of $1000 is due to the fact his patient' insurance doesn't even reimburse him for the entire cost, thanks to the fact millions of Americans, with their smoking, drinking, overeating and unwillingness to exercise - in general, laziness - have made the business of insurance an increasingly unprofitable one. In sum - start by blaming yourself, not your doctor.

To conclude, this alarming trend in American culture in which people have no qualms about hating those who produce the most, is only going to result in cataclysm. An ever dwindling number of producers is being held more and more responsible for supporting an ever growing number of people dependent on the government dole for their livelihood. Eventually, a critical mass tipping point will be encountered - and you might find the people who used to delight in providing premium healthcare at competitive costs have abandoned their specialties for more lucrative and less stressful ones, or have fled to countries where their talents are appreciated and compensated properly.

Crappy Nappy's Perpetual Idiocy


Mistakeretary of Homeland Security, Janet "Crappy Nappy" Napolitano, or as I like to call her, "La Walrusse," for her uncanny, doppleganger-like resemblance to the tusked, blubbery finned mammal, has found herself and her retardepartment of Homeland Security in the news for gross incompetency, racism and demonstrating an overall and inexcusable lack of respect for um, MOST people. By now, everybody is aware of the infamous DHS memo claiming that religious people, returning veterans and a slough of other blanket criteria that include basically 90% of Americans, all have the potential to be domestic terrorists. She has also demonstrated an alarming lack of historical knowledge when it comes to the history of terrorism in North America, suggesting that terrorists have come through Canada in the past. She also claims that crossing the border illegally is "not a crime per se."



Chalk another brilliant appointment up to the Chocolate Genius. Ugh man, my apartment is so cramped, I could sure use more lebensraum. Oops! Label me a domestic terrorist. I used a German word. God Bless you Janet. Oops - strike two, I invoked the Christian God.

B.U.L.L.D.Y.K.E.
I swear that doesn't say "bulldyke," it's an acronym. I can't remember for what though.

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

In honor of my dad

My dad has a special place in his heart for Helen of Arabia, so I thought I would post another image of her. Look who I found hiding in Michael Jackson's famous 1983 Thriller video!






I always knew the zombie on the right looked vaguely familiar but I didn't want to make any conclusions. Thanks to modern technology (Microsoft Paint) allowing us to freeze the frame and enlarge, any doubts were assuaged for sure - it really is Helen Thomas. They must have saved so much on makeup and wardrobe.

Sara Robinson: Pathologically Retarded?

Sara Robinson:
The asinine ramblings of Sara "Vagina Dentata" Robinson are as idiotic as they are insipid. The (false) prophets of the Left are at it again - blanketing all conservative opposition under the undeserved yet overused "racism" knell. If this were a video game, or Dungeons and Dragons, the "racism" card would be the cheap Endgame magic that ultimately resulted in you not passing go and not collecting your $200.

Spit out anything you're eating in advance as I invite you to take a second to read this drivel. As evidenced by her lackluster writing style, I'm game to guess that Robinson spent more time slobbing the English Professor's pole at her fancy liberal education instead of paying attention.

http://www.alternet.org/mediaculture/139825

Gay. Honestly, you give the GOP far too much credit. We are too busy trying to find ways to reverse the statist damage you are doing to our Republic to have the time to engage in some racial conspiracy. Blacks are 12% of our population; you want to take 100% of our money. Guess what we care more about? BOO YAH, whore.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Helen Thomas really is the Wicked Witch

The gloves are off. I have no qualms about calling an 86 year old a piece of trash. This classless, anti-American media whoreling is as partial as no journalist should ever be allowed. Let's review some of Windbag's laughable responses to those with the gall of calling Ms. Thomas out on the fact she exudes unmitigated bias:

"I'm a liberal, I was born a liberal, I'll be one 'til I die, what else should a reporter be when you see so much and when we have such great privilege and access to the truth?"

Um, truth becomes a subjective concept in the realm of the left. For example, the truth is that JFK was a ridiculous president, yet Thomas consistently ranks him her favorite and "the best." Her opinions on presidents are as varied as they probably are on Medicare-funded prescriptions.

When a CBC correspondent prodded Thomas with the proposition to seek impartiality by asking her "Oh, I don't know, How about objective?" the cunty Thomas responds:

"You're not asking people not to think not to care are you?"

No, we wouldn't want to have to do your job.

Anyways, Bill O'Reilly referred to her as the Wicked Witch of the East (he meant West) and made a jab that Thomas has covered the White House since Lincoln. Now the Loose-screw Liberals are up in arms, claiming such a "dignified" woman as Thomas deserves respect and not to be criticized. Well, let's see. It's the media's job to criticize the government. The media failed miserably in this respect. They coddled a candidate, greased the wheels so he slipped right past the criticism of the public and gave him a free pass on everything from his dismal failures and sketchy past to his inability to speak without a teleprompter. As a result, O'Reilly decided to criticize the media for not doing its job....and now O'Reilly is being criticized by the same people who had the wool pulled over their eyes.

She doesn't deserve special treatment for being an old crusty bitch. She's being evaluated on her failure to do her job. She bitched and moaned constantly during Bush's presidency and now she's singing a noticeably more pleasant song for the current administration. This proves you can be a two-faced bitch at any age.

Margaret Thatcher is a genius

I'll leave this post simple. In light of trillion dollar bailouts, manufactured crises, financial panic and borrowing against our grandchildren, a mortgage industry on the verge of subsidy, it should make sense.

"The problem with Socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money."

Brilliant.
The Iron Lady needs to have a few words with Chairman Zero.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

If a celebrity says something liberal and nobody thinks they have any credibility, why does it still make a sound?


Ashley "I've never been in a high-grossing or critically acclaimed movie" Judd has had time, inbetween hiding food from her grossly overweight alcoholic, depressed half-sister Wynonna, to come down with Palin Derangement Syndrome. In the latest liberal attack on a woman who has done absolutely nothing wrong, from a woman who has absolutely no idea what she is attacking, Judd has taken pot-shots at Palin for condoning shooting wild wolves from helicopters. To the naked, uninformed eye, this practice seems barbaric. However, being uninformed about any issue, let alone a hotbed environmental issue, should not be characteristic of a 40something Hollywood actress whose opinions are taken to heart by her vapid fans. Er, fan.

Let's review the facts. Alaskans depend on moose and caribou for food and a multitude of other resources. Until recently, the environment was in equilibrium, until "conservation efforts" put into place by liberals forced native Alaskan wolves out of their indigenous range and out into adjacent quadrants, where they metastasized, multiplied exponentially and have nearly eradicated the native caribou population. So, Governor Palin, depending on one of her most valuable assets - native wisdom - (a wisdom Ms. Judd does not have, far removed from the reality of those living in Alaska in her Los Angeles-area ivory tower) allowed hunters to take measures to control the wolf population by sniping them from helicopters, so that the livelihood and well-being of literally thousands of isolated Alaskans remained intact. A liberal always places animals' rights before human beings'. However, let us remember, these wolves would most likely have stayed quarantined to their native ranges had liberals not interfered with natural order.

I would like to apologize on behalf of the insightful and actionary Governor Palin for looking out for the best interests of her state's population. I apologize she valued the lives of thousands of human beings more than the lives of lupine predators who would start going after humans when the caribou population went extinct. Lastly, I would like to apologize to the irascible Ashley Judd for being too much of an invalid to do some background readings and base her viewpoints on logic rather than emotion. Maybe she realized she hasn't had any blockbusters....for quite some time, or really, ever. Maybe she desperately wants to jump on the feel good Obama kool-aid bandwagon and attack the reputations of people she has never met or knows nothing about, before people wise up to the fact they were duped by the left's lies and no longer support any liberal causes. Maybe she was under pressure by an agent to do something - anything - to get back in the limelight. Next time Miss Judd, I recommend a Vanity Fair shoot instead of backing a cause that is going to bite you in the Golden Globe...oh wait, you don't have one.

Monday, February 2, 2009

The Entitlement Class is incapable of analyzing consequences.Thi

I am half asleep and exhausted, so this would be a short meeting. I am tired of the "taker" class always assuming to be taken care of by the "provider class." I have realized that these societal patterns reflect basic individual behavior. I notice in my life that some people do not know how to take care of their own needs. For example, if one person runs out of cigarettes, he or she instinctively borrows/steals them from the next nearest person, either a roommate or boyfriend and girlfriend. That person then has to ask a coworker or friend to borrow a cigarette because they have now run out much earlier than they should have.

We'll call the first person, the irresponsible one, Patient Zero. Patient Zero probably ran out of cigarettes because he or she went to the club one too many times that week, way beyond the margin of responsibility. He or she spent all of their money and smoked all of their cigarettes, and after making the decision "cigs or rent" one too many times, realizes they now have to bum them from others until the next paycheck. Unfortunately, at every juncture, Patient Zero's irresponsible behavior has spiraled off, negatively impacting somebody at every turn. At the club, they probably needed somebody to buy them a drink. Everyone in that person's life is now affected by a chain reaction. Patient Zero probably had to borrow rent money from a relative since they spent too much of it out. The family member is now strapped for cash, setting off a chain reaction. Patient Zero was involved in a drunk driving incident so asked another friend to borrow their car to get to work and in the process got a fender bender, something the owner of the vehicle has managed to constantly avoid. Now the vehicle owner's life is in turmoil as they sacrifice time and money to get the car repaired.

If fucking irresponsible people, whether they be alcoholic lesbians, or Obama-voting liberals, keep asking us for handouts and entitlements due to their own irresponsibility, they set off a cultural ripple that hurts and imposes on thousands of people down the line.

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Bipartisanship is not what politics is about...

Um, so there are two political parties because the majority of Americans believe in different idealogies. Unfortunately, the idealogy Barack Hussein Obama believes in is that of socialism.

For those of you living under a rock, Robama Hood is eagerly trying to pass a nearly $1 trillion bailout on top of the $750b bailout Bush already passed. He screeched at Republican lawmakers opposing the magnum opus of his 8 day legacy, the one that will get him forever known for as the man who destroyed capitalism, claiming that they "can't listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done" and he's angry there is not a bipartisan spirit. NO SHIT THERE ISN'T A BIPARTISAN SPIRIT - Republicans DON'T WANT YOUR INDENTURED SERVITUDE ACT being passed! And who are we kidding? The only reason he wants a "bipartisan" spirit is when this "stimulus" fails to stimulate anything other than welfare class self-entitlement, he'll get to shove the blame onto Republicans, which is all Democrats are really good at.

Don't get me started on Rahm Emanuel, the pinnacle example of Short Man's complex. The midgetous Emanuel states today that one should "never let a crisis go to waste," expounding on this by explaining that severe crises are ways to dupe people into accepting changes they would never have gone for. What a piece of shit. "Rahm-Bo" the Clown.

The truth is plain and simple. Liberals, in an effort to garnish ill-gotten votes, cater to the lowest common denominator - the poor, disenfranchised and minorities. They do this because anybody with common sense and self pride is already a Republican. To make their constituency feel better about being part of the trashy party, they pretend they are the party of altruism and equality. They throw libelous words and phrases around they don't really understand, like "Cheney and the other neocons are war criminals." They release ridiculous "studies" and "facts" claiming that "Democrats tend to be better educated and wealthier" which are the same conclusions you would draw from any comparison of urban to rural communities, urban areas being bastions of Trashocrats. It is no surprise liberals congregate in large cities - the herd mentality these Sheeple exhibit is much more conducive in areas of high population density, so that way when the blind lead the blind, they have a better chance of success just in terms of statistics.

Obama is a shyster fraud. He is robbing us of our dignity and collective spirit. What an arrogant douchebag! Who the hell does he think he is? He was probably too busy dealing heroin (allegedly) and smoking weed during his college days to pay attention in either history or economics, when the rest of us who had to go 2nd tier schools (because we couldn't take advantage of minority quota acceptance like he and his wife) were learning that a.) socialism is bad, anti-American and always fails and b.) government spending exacerbates recessions, not alleviates them.

I hate Barack Obama. I hate Nancy Pelosi. I hate Rahm Emanuel. I hate socialists. I hate Democratic Socialists. I hate Democrats.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Nancy Pelosi, Hypocunt of the House

What a f*ing bitch. I have always had a special place in the area of my brain dedicated to hate and resentment for Nancy Pelosi, the Demosnatch from California who somehow became Speaker of the House, likes to pretend she cares about constitutionality. Let's review, whore!

I am all about "interpretation" but not when it requires rationalization or contradicts what you have said earlier, or contradicts your party platform. This is so typical of liberals.

The evidence (we have TWO examples!):

1. Example 1 "Impeachment Blues"

Summer of 2008: Nancy Pelosi yells at leftist zealots for wanting to impeach Bush, telling them it would be divisive and a distraction from the Democratic agenda. Her motto is "let it slide" and "get over it."

Today: “I think you look at each item and see what is a violation of the law and do we even have a right to ignore it,” Nancy Pelosi says “And other things that are maybe time that is spent better looking to the future rather than to the past.”

A violation of the law?! Obama isn't even a CITIZEN! I'm pretty sure being a citizen is spelled out in the Constitution...you know, the document we derive all our laws from.

2. Example 2 "Flags of our Fathers"

The Law (The Official Flag Code): “The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.”

Today: Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


Why isn't this hypocrisy noted? I thought we had a media for this exact reason. Why aren't people talking about this? Please stop claiming Bush's War on Terror is unconstitutional, or waterboarding known terrorists who kill Americans is "illegal" and "unconstitutional," but then claim that putting a Muslim non-citizen into office isn't unconstitutional and neither is defiling and debasing our country's flag. F* you Nazi Smellosi. You'll get yours. Karma is a bitch.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

A Long Time Ago, in a Beltway Far Far Away

So apparently, the Constitutionally protected media, which received this protection so that it remains an impartial protector and possibly, potential exposer of corruption or Government wrongdoing has decided to abandon any and all pretense of impartiality. Technically, the freedom of the press should be revoked, since it now belongs to the liberals and only feeds us what the government deems us worthy to hear. It kind of reminds me of...Hitler's Germany, or Stalin's Russia, or Kim Jong-Il's North Korea. Keep in mind these are all people Sean Penn has either fantasized about being or currently is B.F.F.'s with. Actually, to use an example that might resonate a bit better with my readers, think of it as Emperor Palpatine's Galactic Empire from Star Wars. Think of the 2008 economic downturn, subprime mortgage crisis and financial market collapse as the equivalent of the Clone Wars. The liberals engineered these events to create a crisis and atmosphere of fear so that people will back their party unequivocally. I suspect we might see Obama having the entirely Democratic Congress granting him the equivalent of "emergency powers" to handle this manufactured crisis, and a possible dissolution of the two-term Presidential limit, ostensibly of course for a "temporary" time frame. Hell, we don't even have to look as far as Lucas. Um, Caesar did it...oh that's right, so did FDR, Obama's most direct presidential parallel, also known as "the man who tripled the Great Depression" with his ridiculous government spending programs.

In any case, that's just my prediction, and it's tangential. The point of this entry is to showcase that the media can spin just about anything how they want. Let's compare their treatment of two consecutive presidents' exercise regimes.

Obama's flabby, Butter-tits body, with "pecs" that more closely resemble runny eggs, has received more-than-fawning treatment by the media. The wonderful Ann Coulter said it best in her new book "Guilty," by claiming the media basically wants to have sex with Obama. When Obama was recently on a Hawaiian vacation, he of course went to the beach in swimming trunks. The headlines ran rampant:

"Fit for Office!"
"Gym Workouts help Obama carry the Weight of his Position"

Before I go further, I have to give credit where it's due - I was inspired to write this blog based on one Michelle Malkin herself wrote recently, so if you happen to come across this Mrs. Malkin, you were the muse behind my blog. But, in any case, let's examine the media's treatment of The Moonbat Messiah's exercise regime with "War-Crimes" Bush's.

Here's some of the musings of our impartial media regarding Obama, from The Washington Post (Eli Zaslow):

The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weightlifting sessions each week, and a body toned by regular treadmill runs and basketball games.”

Aaaand, here is one of the pictures he is referencing:


Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


Um honestly? I seriously threw up in my mouth. A more correct interpretation of this picture would be:

"Under the intensity of the Hawaiian sun, Obama's moobs began to melt into a buttery blend of tit-fat and flab, oozing off his upper torso with a consistency similar to undercooked eggs." I have a fabulous chest. I can write these things with conviction.


Moving on. Obama's Chicago friend Marty Nesbitt says of the president-elect's exercise regime: "He doesn’t think of it as something he has to do — it’s his time for himself, a chance for him to reflect. It’s his break. He feels better and more revved up after he gets in his workout.”

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


The current President - you know, the one whose office actually has a legitimate Seal, also likes to exercise. The media, however, had something a little different to say about him.

A former Washington Post writer, Jonathan Chait wrote a piece entitled "The (over)exercise of power" regarding GW's exercise regimen. He goes on to say “Am I the only person who finds this disturbing?…What I mean is the fact that Bush has an obsession with exercise that borders on the creepy" and "Does the leader of the free world need to attain that level of physical achievement? “It’s nice for Bush that he can take an hour or two out of every day to run, bike or pump iron. Unfortunately, most of us have more demanding jobs than he does.”

Caron Bohen of Reuters echoes Chait's sentiments: “Bush says exercise helps sharpen his thinking. But some of his critics view his exercise obsession as an indulgence that takes time away from other priorities."

Fatty Jonathan Chait throws stones from his fat/ glass house:
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us



So, when Obama exercises, he gets lionized. Exercise sharpens his psyche, makes him more prepared to handle the rigors of office, gives him focus and clarity...even though he exercises less, and despite being nearly two decades his junior, doesn't look half as good as GW. When GW exercises, he's a "creep," or "fanatical" and "disturbing," and it detracts from his ability to lead the nation. Maybe he exercised so much to get over the fact the media was constantly undermining him at every turn, or making his job 20x more difficult, or because he was shockingly and depressingly alone in his convictions with little to no support, while liberal America orchestrated a plot to destroy his credibility in their attempts to vilify him.

Racism!

Since America is hellbent on becoming a nation that hates its founders, I would like to take the opportunity to expose one of the liberal media's most hateful harbingers.
The name of this blacktress is Gwen Ifill. You may remember her as the hateful and myopic "moderator" which clearly means "ringer" for one of the 2008 Presidential debates. In her "book," entitled "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the 'Age of Obama'" this sham fraud relays the conversation that Diane Patrick, wife of Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, had with the Boston Globe, chastising the outlet for the use of the "racist" term 'tricked out' to describe the Gov.'s new Cadillac.

"'It didn’t have boom boxes, speakers on the outside, but they called it tricked-out,'”Ifill quoted Patrick as saying."

Hey Gwen Ifill, how about this: you are a hate-mongering fat bitch who hates White people, has a face like a bonobo and very well may be the missing link. Do NOT claim to be bipartisan. You're biparti-sham.