Bipartisanship is not what politics is about...

Um, so there are two political parties because the majority of Americans believe in different idealogies. Unfortunately, the idealogy Barack Hussein Obama believes in is that of socialism.

For those of you living under a rock, Robama Hood is eagerly trying to pass a nearly $1 trillion bailout on top of the $750b bailout Bush already passed. He screeched at Republican lawmakers opposing the magnum opus of his 8 day legacy, the one that will get him forever known for as the man who destroyed capitalism, claiming that they "can't listen to Rush Limbaugh and get things done" and he's angry there is not a bipartisan spirit. NO SHIT THERE ISN'T A BIPARTISAN SPIRIT - Republicans DON'T WANT YOUR INDENTURED SERVITUDE ACT being passed! And who are we kidding? The only reason he wants a "bipartisan" spirit is when this "stimulus" fails to stimulate anything other than welfare class self-entitlement, he'll get to shove the blame onto Republicans, which is all Democrats are really good at.

Don't get me started on Rahm Emanuel, the pinnacle example of Short Man's complex. The midgetous Emanuel states today that one should "never let a crisis go to waste," expounding on this by explaining that severe crises are ways to dupe people into accepting changes they would never have gone for. What a piece of shit. "Rahm-Bo" the Clown.

The truth is plain and simple. Liberals, in an effort to garnish ill-gotten votes, cater to the lowest common denominator - the poor, disenfranchised and minorities. They do this because anybody with common sense and self pride is already a Republican. To make their constituency feel better about being part of the trashy party, they pretend they are the party of altruism and equality. They throw libelous words and phrases around they don't really understand, like "Cheney and the other neocons are war criminals." They release ridiculous "studies" and "facts" claiming that "Democrats tend to be better educated and wealthier" which are the same conclusions you would draw from any comparison of urban to rural communities, urban areas being bastions of Trashocrats. It is no surprise liberals congregate in large cities - the herd mentality these Sheeple exhibit is much more conducive in areas of high population density, so that way when the blind lead the blind, they have a better chance of success just in terms of statistics.

Obama is a shyster fraud. He is robbing us of our dignity and collective spirit. What an arrogant douchebag! Who the hell does he think he is? He was probably too busy dealing heroin (allegedly) and smoking weed during his college days to pay attention in either history or economics, when the rest of us who had to go 2nd tier schools (because we couldn't take advantage of minority quota acceptance like he and his wife) were learning that a.) socialism is bad, anti-American and always fails and b.) government spending exacerbates recessions, not alleviates them.

I hate Barack Obama. I hate Nancy Pelosi. I hate Rahm Emanuel. I hate socialists. I hate Democratic Socialists. I hate Democrats.

Nancy Pelosi, Hypocunt of the House

What a f*ing bitch. I have always had a special place in the area of my brain dedicated to hate and resentment for Nancy Pelosi, the Demosnatch from California who somehow became Speaker of the House, likes to pretend she cares about constitutionality. Let's review, whore!

I am all about "interpretation" but not when it requires rationalization or contradicts what you have said earlier, or contradicts your party platform. This is so typical of liberals.

The evidence (we have TWO examples!):

1. Example 1 "Impeachment Blues"

Summer of 2008: Nancy Pelosi yells at leftist zealots for wanting to impeach Bush, telling them it would be divisive and a distraction from the Democratic agenda. Her motto is "let it slide" and "get over it."

Today: “I think you look at each item and see what is a violation of the law and do we even have a right to ignore it,” Nancy Pelosi says “And other things that are maybe time that is spent better looking to the future rather than to the past.”

A violation of the law?! Obama isn't even a CITIZEN! I'm pretty sure being a citizen is spelled out in the Constitution...you know, the document we derive all our laws from.

2. Example 2 "Flags of our Fathers"

The Law (The Official Flag Code): “The flag should never have placed upon it, nor on any part of it, nor attached to it any mark, insignia, letter, word, figure, design, picture, or drawing of any nature.”

Today:


Why isn't this hypocrisy noted? I thought we had a media for this exact reason. Why aren't people talking about this? Please stop claiming Bush's War on Terror is unconstitutional, or waterboarding known terrorists who kill Americans is "illegal" and "unconstitutional," but then claim that putting a Muslim non-citizen into office isn't unconstitutional and neither is defiling and debasing our country's flag. F* you Nazi Smellosi. You'll get yours. Karma is a bitch.

A Long Time Ago, in a Beltway Far Far Away

So apparently, the Constitutionally protected media, which received this protection so that it remains an impartial protector and possibly, potential exposer of corruption or Government wrongdoing has decided to abandon any and all pretense of impartiality. Technically, the freedom of the press should be revoked, since it now belongs to the liberals and only feeds us what the government deems us worthy to hear. It kind of reminds me of...Hitler's Germany, or Stalin's Russia, or Kim Jong-Il's North Korea. Keep in mind these are all people Sean Penn has either fantasized about being or currently is B.F.F.'s with. Actually, to use an example that might resonate a bit better with my readers, think of it as Emperor Palpatine's Galactic Empire from Star Wars. Think of the 2008 economic downturn, subprime mortgage crisis and financial market collapse as the equivalent of the Clone Wars. The liberals engineered these events to create a crisis and atmosphere of fear so that people will back their party unequivocally. I suspect we might see Obama having the entirely Democratic Congress granting him the equivalent of "emergency powers" to handle this manufactured crisis, and a possible dissolution of the two-term Presidential limit, ostensibly of course for a "temporary" time frame. Hell, we don't even have to look as far as Lucas. Um, Caesar did it...oh that's right, so did FDR, Obama's most direct presidential parallel, also known as "the man who tripled the Great Depression" with his ridiculous government spending programs.

In any case, that's just my prediction, and it's tangential. The point of this entry is to showcase that the media can spin just about anything how they want. Let's compare their treatment of two consecutive presidents' exercise regimes.

Obama's flabby, Butter-tits body, with "pecs" that more closely resemble runny eggs, has received more-than-fawning treatment by the media. The wonderful Ann Coulter said it best in her new book "Guilty," by claiming the media basically wants to have sex with Obama. When Obama was recently on a Hawaiian vacation, he of course went to the beach in swimming trunks. The headlines ran rampant:

"Fit for Office!"
"Gym Workouts help Obama carry the Weight of his Position"

Before I go further, I have to give credit where it's due - I was inspired to write this blog based on one Michelle Malkin herself wrote recently, so if you happen to come across this Mrs. Malkin, you were the muse behind my blog. But, in any case, let's examine the media's treatment of The Moonbat Messiah's exercise regime with "War-Crimes" Bush's.

Here's some of the musings of our impartial media regarding Obama, from The Washington Post (Eli Zaslow):

“The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weightlifting sessions each week, and a body toned by regular treadmill runs and basketball games.”

Aaaand, here is one of the pictures he is referencing:

Um honestly? I seriously threw up in my mouth. A more correct interpretation of this picture would be:

"Under the intensity of the Hawaiian sun, Obama's moobs began to melt into a buttery blend of tit-fat and flab, oozing off his upper torso with a consistency similar to undercooked eggs." I have a fabulous chest. I can write these things with conviction.

Moving on. Obama's Chicago friend Marty Nesbitt says of the president-elect's exercise regime: "He doesn’t think of it as something he has to do — it’s his time for himself, a chance for him to reflect. It’s his break. He feels better and more revved up after he gets in his workout.”




The current President - you know, the one whose office actually has a legitimate Seal, also likes to exercise. The media, however, had something a little different to say about him.

A former Washington Post writer, Jonathan Chait wrote a piece entitled "The (over)exercise of power" regarding GW's exercise regimen. He goes on to say “Am I the only person who finds this disturbing?…What I mean is the fact that Bush has an obsession with exercise that borders on the creepy" and "Does the leader of the free world need to attain that level of physical achievement? “It’s nice for Bush that he can take an hour or two out of every day to run, bike or pump iron. Unfortunately, most of us have more demanding jobs than he does.”

Caron Bohen of Reuters echoes Chait's sentiments: “Bush says exercise helps sharpen his thinking. But some of his critics view his exercise obsession as an indulgence that takes time away from other priorities."

Fatty Jonathan Chait throws stones from his fat/ glass house:

So, when Obama exercises, he gets lionized. Exercise sharpens his psyche, makes him more prepared to handle the rigors of office, gives him focus and clarity...even though he exercises less, and despite being nearly two decades his junior, doesn't look half as good as GW. When GW exercises, he's a "creep," or "fanatical" and "disturbing," and it detracts from his ability to lead the nation. Maybe he exercised so much to get over the fact the media was constantly undermining him at every turn, or making his job 20x more difficult, or because he was shockingly and depressingly alone in his convictions with little to no support, while liberal America orchestrated a plot to destroy his credibility in their attempts to vilify him.

Racism!

Since America is hellbent on becoming a nation that hates its founders, I would like to take the opportunity to expose one of the liberal media's most hateful harbingers.
The name of this blacktress is Gwen Ifill. You may remember her as the hateful and myopic "moderator" which clearly means "ringer" for one of the 2008 Presidential debates. In her "book," entitled "The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the 'Age of Obama'" this sham fraud relays the conversation that Diane Patrick, wife of Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, had with the Boston Globe, chastising the outlet for the use of the "racist" term 'tricked out' to describe the Gov.'s new Cadillac.

"'It didn’t have boom boxes, speakers on the outside, but they called it tricked-out,'”Ifill quoted Patrick as saying."

Hey Gwen Ifill, how about this: you are a hate-mongering fat bitch who hates White people, has a face like a bonobo and very well may be the missing link. Do NOT claim to be bipartisan. You're biparti-sham.